Sunday, May 24, 2020

Quick Facts on the Korean War

The Korean War began on June 25, 1950 and ended on July 27, 1953. Where The Korean War took place on the Korean Peninsula, initially in South Korea, and then later in North Korea as well. Who North Korean communist forces called the North Korean Peoples Army (KPA) under President Kim Il-Sung began the war.  Mao Zedongs Chinese Peoples Volunteer Army (PVA) and the Soviet Red Army joined later. Note - the majority of the soldiers in the Peoples Volunteer Army were not really volunteers. On the other side, the South Korean Republic of Korea Army (ROK) joined forces with the United Nations. The UN force included troops from: United States (approx. 327,000)Great Britain (14,000)Canada (8,000)Turkey (5,500)Australia (2,300)Ethiopia (1,600)The Philippines (1,500)New Zealand (1,400)Thailand (1,300)Greece (1,250)France (1,200)Colombia (1,000)Belgium (900)South Africa (825)The Netherlands (800)Sweden (170)Norway (100)Denmark (100)Italy (70)India (70)Luxembourg (45) Maximum Troop Deployment South Korea and UN: 972,214 North Korea, China, USSR: 1,642,000 Who Won the Korean War? Neither side actually won the Korean War. In fact, the war goes on to this day, since the combatants never signed a peace treaty. South Korea did not even sign the Armistice agreement of July 27, 1953, and North Korea repudiated the armistice in 2013. In terms of territory, the two Koreas returned essentially to their pre-war boundaries, with a demilitarized zone (DMZ) dividing them roughly along the 38th parallel. The civilians on each side truly lost the war, which resulted in millions of civilian deaths and economic devastation. Total Estimated Casualties South Korea and UN troops: 178,236 killed, 32,844 missing, 566,314 wounded.North Korea, USSR, and Chinese troops: Numbers are unclear, but American estimates range from 367,000 to 750,000 killed, about 152,000 missing or taken prisoner  and 686,500 to 789,000 wounded.South Korean civilians: 373,599 killed, 229,625 wounded, and 387,744 missingNorth Korean civilians: estimated 1,550,000 casualtiesTotal civilian deaths and injuries: approximately 2.5 million Major Events and Turning Points June 25, 1950: North Korea invades South KoreaJune 28, 1950: North Korean forces capture southern capital, SeoulJune 30, 1950: US pledges troops to UN effort for defense of South KoreaSept. 15, 1950: ROK and UN troops confined to Pusan Perimeter, launch counter-offensive Invasion of InchonSept. 27, 1950: UN troops recapture SeoulOct. 9, 1950: ROK and UN troops drive KPA back across 38th Parallel, South Koreans and allies invade North KoreaOct. 19, 1950: ROK and UN capture northern capital of PyongyangOct. 26, 1950: South Korean and UN troops mass along Yalu River, the North Korea/China borderOct. 27, 1950: China enters war on North Korean side, pushes UN/South Korean troops backNov. 27-30, 1950: Battle of Chosin ReservoirJan. 15, 1951: North Korean and Chinese troops retake SeoulMarch 7 - April 4, 1951: Operation Ripper, ROK and UN push combined communist forces above 38th parallel againMarch 18, 1951: UN forces recapture Seoul once moreJuly 10 - Aug. 23, 1951: Truce negotiations at Kaesong amidst continued bloody fightingNov. 27, 1951: 38th parallel set as line of demarcationThroughout 1952: Bloody battles and trench warfareApril 23, 1953: Kaesong peace talks resumeJuly 27, 1953: UN, North Korea, and China sign armistice, ending fighting More Information on the Korean War: Detailed Timeline of the Korean WarPhotographs from the Korean WarThe Invasion of IncheonMap of the Pusan Perimeter and the Invasion of Incheon

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Short Review Of The Scarlet Ibis - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 1 Words: 393 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/08/02 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: The Scarlet Ibis Essay Did you like this example? This story was about a kid who was born with disabilities where he could not walk. He was having a really sad life and he had a brother older than him. His brother was mad and selfish for his own reasons The narrator of The Scarlet Ibis is a kid who is never been named. We only know that he lives in a country, near a old swamp that they love to go to and the ocean, and that hes six when his little brother is born. Now, the kid brother, William Armstrong, is born with some disabilities. They fear that his mind is very damaged just like his body they say. His family is so down on the little guy that they built a kid-sized coffin for him because they thought he was going to die, just, you know, planning ahead.Older brother has high hopes that William will fulfill his fantasies of a ball-throwing, rope-jumping, swamp-swimming, boat-rowing, sporty little brother. However, while Doodles body doesnt work all that well, the kid turns out to have a very nice brain. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Short Review Of The Scarlet Ibis" essay for you Create order So, his first plan was to smother his brother with a pillow because he was so selfish. But he is not doing that anymore, he decides to keep him around. Thats what you call brotherly love! Sometimes our narrator is really sweet to Doodle, like when he encourages Doodle to keep trying until he can at some point stand on his own, like when he drags Doodle to the barn where the family has stowed the tiny coffin they had built for him. The sweet older brother wont let Doodle leave until he touches his own coffin. Doodle grows up under the on and off love of his brother, learns to walk, and impresses the family with a natural knack for telling stories. Hes an imaginative, sensitive child, but our lovely narrator will be happy enough with nothing less than his athletic brother. When Doodle gets the ok to attend the school for the first surprising time, his brother plans on a plan to get Doodles fitness up to his standards so he wont be an embarrassment to him in the schoolyard. The narrator has his little brother trying to do all these things that he cant even do yet like climb ropes, row boats, and swim and all these other things

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

The Role of Marketing Free Essays

1. Markets bring together buyers and sellers of goods and services. In some cases, such as a local fruit stall, buyers and sellers meet physically. We will write a custom essay sample on The Role of Marketing or any similar topic only for you Order Now In other cases, such as the stock market, business can be transacted over the telephone, almost by remote control. We need not go into these details. Instead, we use a general definition of markets. 2. What the term market means A market is a shorthand expression for the process by which household’s decisions about consumption of alternative goods, firms’ decisions about what and how to produce, and workers’ decisions about how much and for whom to work are all reconciled by adjustment of prices Prices of goods and of resources, such as labour, machinery and land, adjust to ensure that scarce resources are used to produce those goods and services that society demands. 4. Economics studies markets and prices Much of economics is devoted to the study of how markets and prices enable society to solve the problem of what, how, and for whom to produce. Suppose you buy a hamburger for your lunch. What does this have to do with markets and prices? You chose the cafà © because it was fast, convenient and cheap. Given your desire to eat, and your limited resources, the low hamburger price told you that this was a good way to satisfy your appetite. You probably prefer steak but that is more expensive. The price of steak is high enough to ensure that society answers the â€Å"for whom† question about lunchtime steaks in favour of someone else. 5. The seller’s viewpoint Now think about the seller’s viewpoint. The cafà © owner is in the business because, given the price of hamburger meat, the rent and the wages that must be paid, it is still possible to sell hamburgers at a profit. If rents were higher, it might be more profitable to sell hamburgers in a cheaper area or to switch to luxury lunches for rich executives on expense accounts. The student behind the counter is working there because it is a suitable part-time job which pays a bit of money. If the wage were much lower it would hardly be worth working at all. Conversely, the job is unskilled and there are plenty of students looking for such work, so owners of cafes do not have to offer very high wages. 6. Prices guide your decision Prices are guiding your decision to buy a hamburger, the owner’s decision to sell hamburgers, and the student’s decision to take the job. Society is allocating resources – meat, buildings, and labour – into hamburger production through the price system. If nobody liked hamburgers, the owner could not sell enough at a price that covered the cost of running the cafà © and society would devote no resources to hamburger production. People’s desire to eat hamburgers guides resources into hamburger production. However, if cattle contracted a disease, thereby reducing the economy’s ability to produce meat products, competition to purchase more scarce supplies of beef would bid up the price of beef, hamburger producers would be forced to raise prices, and consumers would buy more cheese sandwiches for lunch. Adjustments in prices would encourage society to reallocate resources to reflect the increased scarcity of cattle. 7. We have adopted a general definition of markets There were several markets involved in your purchase of a hamburger. You and the cafà © owner were part of the market for lunches. The student behind the counter was part of the local labour market. The cafà © owner was part of the local wholesale meat market and the local market for rented buildings. These descriptions of markets are not very precise. Were you part of the market for lunches, the market for prepared food, or the market for sandwiches to which you would have turned if hamburgers had been more expensive? That is why we have adopted a very general definition of markets which emphasises that they are arrangements through which prices influence the allocation of scarce resources. How to cite The Role of Marketing, Essays

Monday, May 4, 2020

Pioneers in Entrepreneurship and Small Business †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Pioneers in Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management. Answer: Introduction: A reflective report is a report which involves the use of personal experiences as a consideration when describing the context or meaning of a specific theme or topic. In the past semester in class I have been able to learn a lot in respect to myself, the coursework I engaged in and learnt while undertaking the class. Design thinking is the utilization of creative strategies while working or implementing a project to ensure that it something that is very innovative and will be of benefit to its users. Entrepreneurship is the process of identifying a need and designing a solution which will solve or fulfill the need and making the whole endeavor a business (Brush et al, 2003). In this paper I will be able to display my thought process management and how I perceived various experiences during the time we pursued this unit. Design thinking is a way in which individuals can view issues or problems so that they are able to come up with very innovative ideas to resolve these issues (Brown, 2008). The design thinking process is a new way of helping individuals solve problems in a more efficient way. It can be used in various fields since problems span to all disciplines and the utilization of design thinking can help in resolving of these issues. In business, design thinking is used by professionals by matching the necessary and appropriate technology available to the needs of the people or their clients. In design thinking the business professional is tasked with fulfilling the needs of his or her clients while by coming up with a viable business strategy which can become a market opportunity and bring their clients value. Design thinking takes a practical approach by trying to come up with a creative way of solving problems (Beinecke, 2009). It is referred to as a solution based approach since the purpose of it is to provide or come up with a result which is constructive and beneficial. Design thinking is different compared to the scientific method of solving problems because it considers feedback of the sample population by incorporating their emotional state which the scientific method does not. Critical self-analysis is the careful consideration of all facts given to an individual and analyzing them to come up with a feasible and viable solution. Based on what we have been able to learn this semester my approach to various issues now incorporates a lot of critical self-analysis. As I approach any task I try to define what kind of solution can be obtained which is viable and feasible by use of the design thinking process. During my time this semester I embarked on solving a problem which I realized faced some of my fellow students. I was able to critically analyze the situation and discovered that there are a lot of people who are not able to get to their respective classes since there is not synced reminder or system which can ease their problem. I decided to embark on this journey in trying to solve this problem for my fellow classmates (Zhang Cuete, 2015). Most of my classmates used to miss their lecturers because they simply had not set reminders on their devices. I had also fallen into this problem once in a while when I was overwhelmed with a lot of work. The tedious task of setting up reminders for every lecture an individual is supposed to attend in a day was very boring and most students simply did not do it. They missed classes a lot and this affected their academic performance. Some of my classmates had no idea that they had such a problem because they had become accustomed to managing by themselves using normal printed timetables. As I suggested my idea to them they were amazed that such a solution could be developed to solve a problem which they did not think they had in the first place. Design thinking was a process I used in trying to come up with a solution which would solve the problem in which my classmates were being faced with. Design thinking utilized a divergent thinking approach. This means that when you utilize design thinking in your operations you care able to identify and explore many possible solutions to a problem before i dentifying the best feasible and viable solution to solve the problem at hand (Brown Wyatt, 2010). Convergent thinking is the simple process of narrowing down the different solutions achieved to identify a best fit solution to a need or problem. Design thinking also uses the concept of building up ideas which have no limits during the brainstorming phase. When having a brainstorming session such as this it encourages the parties involved to be more open and participate in giving of ideas and reduces the fear of failure in the participants. Design thinking encourages out of the box thinking so that conventional solutions are not the only one which are considered (Visser, 2006). Here all spheres are considered to identify which is best places to solve a particular problem. The design thinking process has several stages which include defining the problem, researching on the problem, ideate which is to come up with all possible solutions until a final solution is achieved, prototyping which is building the solution which is agreed upon, implementing the solution and learning how the solution impacts users or how it is adopted by users (Cross, 2006). I was able to form a team which would help me in solving the problem I had ident ified. We researched on the problem, how people had been faced by it and what solutions they were currently using. We brainstormed for a while during the ideation process and discovered that since most students had smartphones we would be able to create a solution which would run on their devices. The application which was the solution would integrate with their normal calendars and pick up on their schedules. The prototype would be an application that would be able to run on the students mobile phones. The prototyping phase was a very interesting and a distinguishing factor during the whole process. We had identified the problem and came up with a solution but none of us had the necessary skills needed to come up with the kind of application we needed (Ribson, 2002). We had decided on having an application that would pick up all the available lecturers that would occur every day. What the users would have to do is simply pick out the units they had undertaken for that particular semester and an organized timetable would sync to their application and mobile calendars. The users did very little work in setting up so they would not find it to be a tedious, boring or overwhelming task. We came to understand that though we had insights on how the technology would work the actual development would fall to real experts. We had to use our critical analysis skills to identify how the project would move forward. After analysis we decided to approach someone who used to put up fliers in campu s about offering development services (Plattner, Meinel Leifer, 2011). We talked to him and he was very happy to help with a condition that if we were not able to pay his fees he would need a few shares in the company. That was the first instance which hinted to me that what we were doing was a business rather than a simple problem solving task or hobby (Bryan, Tilcsik Zhu, 2017). We had all gotten so into the actual problem solving process that we did not notice that we were giving birth to a business which might be viable. The prototype was soon after developed and we implemented it by giving it to a few students to test it out. The feedback we got was overwhelming. The system was tested for a month and within that time it had been adopted by over one thousand students within the campus. We got to learn so much during the process and we also got offers to improve the system to accommodate other academic institutions. The period after coming up with our prototype we also embarked on setting up a business framework to manage the economic impact of the application would have. We had to take up the design thinking process in coming up with strategies which would enable us to effectively run and manage the business (Noel Ita, 2016). We envisioned the application would bring value to our users and hope they would pay to use the services. We were very right in doing this. A month after the system was implemented the few resources we had come up with to develop and manage the system were becoming scarce. We had to capitalize on the opportunity by scaling our resources to accommodate more users. The model we came up with would allow users to get a thirty day trial of using the system to understand basically how it worked and why they would need it in their daily lives. After this period we charged a monthly subscription. The finances we would acquire would go in continually improving and updating our application to accommodate more users and give every user a worthwhile experience as they used it. We became entrepreneurs because we discovered a problem in which users faced and solved it while being able to make profit from the venture (Crainer Des, 2000). Entrepreneurship is a profession which is sometimes referred to as a calling based on feedback achieved from various industry experts. It entails being your own boss as you venture into solving a problem which is being faced by individuals (Scott Ven katraman, 2000). In our case we were able to identify the problem which the students were facing and we came up with a solution which was feasible, viable and would apply to the students. It goes without question that if we did not utilize design thinking in our problem solving venture we would not have been able to achieve the results that we did. If we also had not achieved skills in critical analysis we would not have been able to identify the problems which the students faced and solved it for them. The behaviors of an entrepreneur involve being a very big risk taker (Yetisen, Volpatti, Coskun, Cho, Kamrani et al., 2015). Here we mean that the entrepreneur should be willing to sacrifice a job or financial security in the pursuit of an idea or a problem which they wish to solve. Entrepreneurship has a lot of uncertainty and therefore anyone venturing into it should have a high tolerance towards a lot of uncertainty and take risks. An entrepreneur should have the ability to learn very fast, be teachable and be able to take advice from others. Entrepreneurship involves an individual trying to solve a problem (Ramoglou, Tsang et al., 2016). The solution to a problem might be very different from what the entrepreneur initially envisions. The coaching, training and advice in which an entrepreneur achieves from other people helps them in ensuring that the product or solution in which they are going to deliver will actually impact its users in a positive way and they will be willing to pay for such a service or solution (Hisrich, 2011). The strategies in which an entrepreneur should use include continuous improvement. This is because for the entrepreneur and their business to remain relevant they need to adapt to chan ges that occur. The entrepreneur should also explore any new or unknown avenues to ensure they identify whether or not they can be able to leverage them in their operations. The entrepreneur should utilize all the business intelligence available to them so that they may be able to come up with innovate solutions that are viable and feasible in the market (Dorst Nigel, 2001). The entrepreneur should also be a good communicator. They should be able to communicate well in front of various individuals and audiences. The purpose of this is because the entrepreneur being the first person of contact in a business they should be able to explain the challenges they observed and how the solution they have come up with effectively solves that problem. This helps them sell their product or solution for it to be known to potential clients that such a solution exists. The utilization of word of mouth from one student to another is what enabled our application to become popular and widely known to other students. We however had to improve in our communication skills because there were people who wanted to establish why the solution was different from other kinds of so lutions on the market. We also had to keep improving and innovating our solution (Dorst, 2012). The design of the application kept improving based on industry standards and the feedback we got from our clients. This enabled us to stand out in the market as the best solution provider for the problem in which the students faced. We continued learning and implementing advice we got to ensure that our business remained relevant. From the experience I have achieved from learning on the concepts of critical analysis and design thinking in this course I have been able to improve in my problem solving skills. I have also learnt that when individuals venture into entrepreneurship they have simply identified a problem which they capitalize on (Landstorm, 2007). They solve the problem in which they have identified and if they have done their research well they have identified clients who will pay for they services or solution they are offering. As I embark on the next few months I plan and purpose to use the skills acquired in this unit to solve the following problems. Streamlining the course work deployment to students and the way in which students hand in their assignments. I have been able to observe that students are facing issues as they work on their assignments. Sometimes they need guidance and mentorship from the lecturers and other students to help them achieve and finish the given assignment. An online me ssaging system which can be accessed by all relevant stakeholders will go a long way in ensuring that the students are able to complete their assignments on time and gain good grades. I also plan to attend several workshops and seminars that will dwell on design thinking and entrepreneurship. I believe even though we have learnt a lot in this unit there is a lot more information to be acquired in the sector. By attending such workshops I can be able to hear from industry experts on how they utilize design thinking in their operations to always ensure they achieve the best and most appropriate solution to any problem they might face. The seminars and workshops will also give me exposure to other industry leading experts who can be able to evaluate the projects I have undertaken or wish to undertake for them to give insight on how they can be improved and scaled to serve more people and be more efficient in becoming a solution to the problem at hand (Katila, Eric, Chen Henning, 2012) . Attending such events and seminars will also improve my behavior by becoming more of a professional who can be able to endeavor in solving specific problems. It will also grow my knowledge bank and maybe in a few years I can become an entrepreneur and solve more problems being faced by people. References Beinecke R. (2009). Leadership for Wicked Problems. The Innovation Journal. pp. 1-7. Brown T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review. Brown T Wyatt J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford social innovation review. Brush C. et al (2003). Doctoral education in the field of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management. 29(3): 309-331. Bryan K.A., Tilcsik A. Zhu B. (2017). Which Entrepreneurs are Coachable and Why? American Economic Review. 107(5): 312-316. Crainer S. Des D. (2000). Generation Entrepreneur. FT Press. p.202. Cross N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer. Dorst K. (2012). Frame Innovation. Create new thinking by design. MIT Press. Dorst K. Nigel C. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies. 22(5): 425-437. Hisrich R. D. (2011). Entrepreneurship. McGraw-Hill Education. Katila R., Eric L., Chen Henning P. (2012). All the right moves: How entrepreneurial firms compete effectively. Strategic Entrepreneurship Jnl. 6(2): 116-132. Landstorm H. (2007). Pioneers in Entrepreneurship and Small Business Research. Springer. Noel C. Ita R. (2016). Aligning healthcare innovation and software requirements through design thinking. IEEE. pp. 1-7. Plattner H, Meinel C. Leifer L. J. (2011). Design thinking: understand, improve, apply. Understanding innovation. Springer. Ramoglou S., Tsang E. W. K. et al. (2016). A realistic perspective of entrepreneurship: Opportunities as propensities. Academy of Management Review. 41(3): 409-434. Ribson M. (2002). Brainstorming. Problem-solving in groups. Gower. p.41. Scott S. Ven katraman S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review. 25: 217-226. Visser W. (2006). The cognitive artifacts of designing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Yetisen A. K., Volpatti L. R., Coskun A. F., Cho S., Kamrani E. et al. (2015). Entrepreneurship. Lab Chip. 15(18): 3638-60. Zhang S. X. Cuete J. (2015). The Study of Bias in Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 41(3): 419-454